null

T-Cell Receptor Signalling: The Complete Pathway, Branch by Branch

The T-cell receptor is the most finely calibrated detector in immunology. It must discriminate an agonist peptide present at a few dozen copies from a self peptide present at tens of thousands, and it does so with a receptor that has no catalytic activity of its own. Every downstream event — the calcium flux, the Ras switch, the NF-κB translocation, the IL-2 burst — is built from borrowed kinases, adaptors with no enzymatic function, and phosphatases that decide how much signal survives.

Key takeaways

  • The TCR/CD3 complex has no kinase domain; proximal signalling is delegated to Lck, held in place by the CD4 or CD8 co-receptor.
  • CD45 and Csk set the Lck set-point — the pathway is poised, not off, in a resting T cell.
  • LAT and SLP-76 are pure adaptors, yet losing either collapses the response entirely.
  • PLCγ1 is the fork: DAG feeds RasGRP→ERK and PKCθ→NF-κB, IP₃ feeds calcineurin→NFAT.
  • Without CD28 signal 2, NFAT acts alone and imposes anergy rather than activation.
ANTIGEN-PRESENTING CELLT-cell plasma membraneNUCLEUSpeptide–MHCCD80 / CD86PD-L1IP₃ → Ca²⁺DAGPIP₃Arp2/3Cbl-b · DGKα raise the activation threshold → anergy if Signal 2 is absentCD45CD4CD8TCR / CD3CD28CTLA-4PD-1CskLckSHP-1FynZAP-70Cbl-bSHP-2ItkVav1LATGadsSLP-76Grb2 · SOSPLCγ1DGKαCalmodulinRac1WASPCofilinCalcineurinPKCθCARMA1Bcl10MALT1IKKIκBRasGRPRasRafMEK1/2ERK1/2RSKJNKc-FosPI3KPTENPDK1AKTmTORGSK-3βNFATNF-κBAP-1Elk-1c-MycFOXO1IL-2Bcl-xLACTIN / IMMUNE SYNAPSECytoskeletal polarisation& stable synapse formationCYTOKINES & CLONAL EXPANSIONIL-2 → autocrine proliferationPROLIFERATIONc-Myc · cell-cycle entrySURVIVALBcl-xL · anti-apoptotic
The full T-cell receptor signalling pathway — 55 nodes across the synapse, the proximal kinase module, the LAT signalosome, the effector branches and the checkpoints.

Explore the interactive version. Every protein in this map is clickable and links straight to the matching Assay Genie In Vivo antibody, ELISA kit or research antibody, with a tooltip explaining its role.

Open the interactive pathway →

Signal 1: the receptor, the co-receptors and the Lck set-point

The TCR/CD3 complex binds peptide–MHC through its αβ heterodimer and signals through ten ITAMs spread across the CD3γε, CD3δε and ζζ chains. None of those chains is an enzyme. Phosphorylation comes from Lck, tethered to the tail of CD4 or CD8 by a zinc-clasp motif. That tether is the point of the co-receptor: by binding the same MHC molecule the TCR is engaging, it delivers Lck to an engaged receptor rather than a bystander.

Lck activity is set by two opposing enzymes, and this is where much of the discrimination happens. Csk phosphorylates the inhibitory C-terminal tyrosine, locking Lck closed; CD45 removes it. Because CD45 also strips the activation-loop phosphate, its effect is dose-dependent — too little and Lck stays shut, too much and it is disarmed. Around 40% of Lck in a resting cell is already primed: the receptor is held at a threshold, not switched off. Segregating the bulky CD45 ectodomain out of close-contact zones turns that small imbalance into a decision, and Fyn handles the weak-agonist end of the range.

ZAP-70 and the LAT signalosome

Doubly phosphorylated ITAMs create a bidentate docking site for the tandem SH2 domains of ZAP-70. Docking alone is not enough: ZAP-70 arrives autoinhibited and must be licensed by Lck on Y315/Y319. That two-step requirement is a proofreading step, and it is why transient, low-affinity contacts fail to propagate. ZAP-70 deficiency in humans gives a selective CD8 lymphopenia with non-functional CD4 cells.

Active ZAP-70 has two substrates that matter, and neither is an enzyme. LAT is a palmitoylated adaptor whose phosphorylated tyrosines nucleate a condensate holding PLCγ1, Gads, Grb2·SOS and PI3K; Gads brings in SLP-76, which recruits Itk and Vav1. Mutating the one LAT tyrosine that binds PLCγ1 causes lymphoproliferation in mice rather than simple immunodeficiency, because the branches downstream are not equally weighted. Vav1 then drives Rac1, WASP and cofilin to build the actin sheet that holds the synapse together.

The fork at PLCγ1: calcium, Ras–ERK and PKCθ

Itk phosphorylates PLCγ1, which hydrolyses PIP₂ into diacylglycerol and IP₃; everything distal is a division of those two products. IP₃ empties the ER store, STIM1 senses the depletion and opens ORAI1, and the sustained Ca²⁺ plateau loads calmodulin to activate the phosphatase calcineurin. Calcineurin then dephosphorylates NFAT and exposes its nuclear localisation signal — the step ciclosporin and tacrolimus block.

DAG has two receivers. RasGRP1 loads Ras with GTP at the membrane; SOS, delivered by Grb2 on LAT, is a second GEF allosterically primed by Ras-GTP itself. RasGRP1 makes the first Ras-GTP, which turns SOS into a positive-feedback amplifier — the basis of the digital, all-or-none ERK response seen in single cells. Ras drives RafMEK1/2 → ERK1/2, and ERK phosphorylates Elk-1 and RSK to induce c-Fos, which pairs with JNK-driven c-Jun as AP-1.

The second receiver is PKCθ, the only PKC isoform stably held at the synapse centre. It phosphorylates CARMA1, which oligomerises with BCL10 and the paracaspase MALT1 to activate IKK, degrade IκBα and release NF-κB. The branches converge on the IL-2 promoter combinatorially: its composite NFAT–AP-1 site needs both partners at once, and NFAT arriving alone transcribes the anergy programme instead.

Signal 2: CD28 and the PI3K–AKT–mTOR arm

CD28 engagement by CD80/CD86 does not start a separate pathway so much as lower the threshold and extend the duration of the one already running. Its YMNM motif recruits PI3K, generating PIP₃ that brings PDK1 and AKT to the membrane; PDK1 supplies T308 and mTORC2 S473, while PTEN opposes the arm by returning PIP₃ to PIP₂.

AKT output is largely a matter of what it switches off. It excludes FOXO1 from the nucleus, removing the programme that maintains quiescence and naive homing, and inactivates GSK-3β — the kinase that re-phosphorylates NFAT to expel it, so inhibition prolongs NFAT residence. AKT also stabilises c-Myc and sustains Bcl-xL. mTOR ties this to physiology: mTORC1 licenses aerobic glycolysis and biases differentiation toward effector fates, which is why rapamycin suppresses effectors while expanding memory and Treg populations.

The brakes: CTLA-4, PD-1, Cbl-b and DGKα

CTLA-4 and CD28 compete for the same ligands, and CTLA-4 binds roughly twenty-fold more tightly. Its dominant mechanism is not signalling but trans-endocytosis: it strips CD80 and CD86 off the antigen-presenting cell and degrades them, removing signal 2 for every T cell nearby. That is why CTLA-4 knockout mice die of lymphoproliferation within weeks while PD-1 knockouts develop only late, organ-restricted autoimmunity. PD-1 works intracellularly instead: its ITSM recruits SHP-2, with help from SHP-1, which dephosphorylates CD28 preferentially over the TCR itself.

Two intrinsic brakes complete the picture, and both enforce anergy. Cbl-b is an E3 ligase that ubiquitinates PI3K and Vav1; CD28 signalling degrades it, so its removal is how costimulation is recorded, and Cbl-b-deficient T cells activate without CD28 at all. DGKα converts DAG to phosphatidic acid, terminating the RasGRP and PKCθ branches at source; it is upregulated in anergic and exhausted cells, and inhibiting it restores Ras–ERK signalling.

Key targets and matching reagents

Target Role in the pathway Reagent
TCR / CD3εAntigen receptor complex; ITAM source for the whole pathwayAnti-mouse CD3 (145-2C11) In Vivo
CD4Co-receptor delivering Lck to MHC class II contactsAnti-mouse CD4 (GK1.5) In Vivo
CD8aCo-receptor for MHC class I; cytotoxic lineage markerAnti-mouse CD8a (Ly-2) In Vivo
CD28Signal 2; recruits PI3K and triggers Cbl-b degradationAnti-mouse CD28 In Vivo
CTLA-4Strips CD80/CD86 from APCs by trans-endocytosisAnti-mouse CTLA-4 (9D9) In Vivo
PD-1Recruits SHP-2 to dephosphorylate CD28 and the TCRAnti-mouse PD-1 (RMP1-14) In Vivo
IL-2Autocrine growth factor; the canonical activation outputAnti-mouse IL-2 (JES6-1A12) In Vivo
ZAP-70Licensed by Lck; phosphorylates LAT and SLP-76Mouse ZAP-70 ELISA kit ELISA
NFAT (NFATc1)Calcineurin-activated transcription factor; ciclosporin targetMouse NFATc1 ELISA kit ELISA
PKCθSynapse-localised DAG sensor; nucleates the CBM complexPRKCQ polyclonal antibody Antibody

Studying TCR signalling in vivo

The proximal half of this pathway is intracellular and best measured biochemically, but the synapse and its checkpoints are surface events, and therefore directly addressable with functional-grade antibodies.

1. Engaging or depleting the T-cell compartment

Anti-CD3 (145-2C11) is the workhorse: plate-bound it drives polyclonal activation, and given systemically it induces transient depletion and receptor modulation. Anti-CD4 (GK1.5) and anti-CD8a (Ly-2) deplete the respective subsets and are the standard way to assign a phenotype to a lineage. Because αCD3 is a potent mitogen, low endotoxin matters more here than almost anywhere: LPS contamination drives cytokine release indistinguishable from an on-target response. Run isotype-matched functional-grade controls throughout.

2. Manipulating costimulation and the checkpoints

Anti-CD28 supplies signal 2 alongside αCD3 and separates anergy from deletion. Anti-CTLA-4 (9D9) and anti-PD-1 (RMP1-14) reproduce the clinical mechanisms in mouse tumour models, and their non-overlapping kinetics — CTLA-4 at priming, PD-1 in the effector phase — make sequencing studies informative rather than merely additive. Read them out with downstream nodes: NFAT, NF-κB p65 and c-Myc report whether proximal signalling was restored.

3. Quantifying the intracellular cascade

Lck, Fyn, ZAP-70, Itk and Csk cover the proximal set-point; LAT, SLP-76, Gads and Vav1 the signalosome; Ras, MEK1, ERK2, JNK1 and AP-1/c-Jun the MAPK branch; PI3K, PDK1, AKT1, PTEN, mTOR, FOXO1 and GSK-3β the metabolic arm. For NF-κB use BCL10, MALT1, IKKβ, IκBα and p65, with Bcl-xL, Cbl-b and DGKα for survival and anergy, and Rac1, WASP and cofilin-1 for the cytoskeleton.

All functional-grade antibodies in this pathway are supplied low-endotoxin and azide-free, formulated for direct administration in mouse models.

Browse the In Vivo range →

Featured products for this pathway

Anti-Mouse CD3 (145-2C11) In Vivo Antibody

The standard functional-grade clone for polyclonal T-cell activation, depletion and receptor modulation.

View product
Anti-Mouse CD28 In Vivo Antibody

Delivers signal 2 alongside anti-CD3, separating productive activation from anergy induction.

View product
Anti-Mouse CTLA-4 (9D9) In Vivo Antibody

Blocks the priming-phase checkpoint that strips CD80 and CD86 from antigen-presenting cells.

View product
Anti-Mouse PD-1 (RMP1-14) In Vivo Antibody

Relieves SHP-2-mediated dephosphorylation of CD28 in the effector phase; the benchmark checkpoint reagent.

View product
Anti-Mouse IL-2 (JES6-1A12) In Vivo Antibody

Neutralises or complexes the autocrine growth factor that is this pathway's canonical output.

View product
Mouse ZAP-70 ELISA Kit

Quantifies the proximal kinase whose licensing by Lck is the pathway's main proofreading step.

View product

Frequently asked questions

Why does the TCR need CD3 and ζ chains rather than signalling itself?

The TCR α and β chains have cytoplasmic tails only a few residues long, so there is nowhere for a kinase to dock. The CD3γε, CD3δε and ζζ modules supply ten ITAMs between them. That multiplicity is not redundancy: partial agonists produce partially phosphorylated ζ chains, so the number of ITAMs modified encodes ligand quality — a graded signal that ZAP-70 reads.

What is the difference between anti-CD3 activation in vitro and in vivo?

Plate-bound anti-CD3 with soluble anti-CD28 crosslinks the receptor and delivers signals 1 and 2 together, giving full activation and IL-2 production. Given systemically, the same clone causes transient cytokine release followed by receptor modulation, partial depletion and a durable tolerogenic state. The difference is presentation and Fc engagement, so isotype and endotoxin level change the outcome.

Why do CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade produce such different phenotypes?

They act in different places and by different mechanisms. CTLA-4 is cell-extrinsic: it removes CD80/CD86 from antigen-presenting cells by trans-endocytosis, constraining priming in lymphoid tissue, and its loss is rapidly lethal in mice. PD-1 is cell-intrinsic: its ITSM recruits SHP-2 to dephosphorylate CD28 in peripheral tissue. Anti-CTLA-4 therefore broadens the responding repertoire while anti-PD-1 reinvigorates existing tumour-infiltrating clones.

Which readouts best distinguish full activation from anergy?

Look at the DAG branches rather than calcium. Anergic cells still flux calcium and still translocate NFAT, but they fail to induce AP-1, so the composite NFAT–AP-1 element is never occupied and the IL-2 promoter stays silent. In practice, measure ERK and c-Fos alongside NFAT and check DGKα and Cbl-b, both elevated in anergy.

Explore the full interactive map. Click any protein for its role and the matching validated reagent.

Open the interactive pathway →In Vivo antibodies

For research use only. Not for use in diagnostic or therapeutic procedures.

19th Aug 2026 Sean Mac Fhearraigh, PhD

Recent Posts