null

CAR-T Cell Signalling Pathway: Costimulation, Output and Assays

A chimeric antigen receptor is a synthetic protein wired into a real signalling pathway. The extracellular half is an antibody fragment; everything below the membrane is borrowed from the T-cell receptor complex and its costimulatory partners. That hybrid design is why CAR-T therapy works, and why its two defining problems — cytokine release syndrome and loss of persistence — are signalling problems rather than manufacturing ones. Reading the pathway from CD19 engagement to granzyme B release shows where each failure is generated.

Key takeaways

  • A CAR fuses an anti-CD19 scFv to a CD3ζ tail: recognition is antibody-like and MHC-independent, but signalling is T-cell-like.
  • LCK → CD3ζ → ZAP-70 → LAT/SLP-76 → PLCγ1 is the proximal module — the same wiring as the TCR, but with three ITAMs instead of ten.
  • CD28 drives PI3K–AKT–mTOR and fast glycolytic expansion; 4-1BB signals through TRAF2 to NF-κB and favours persistence.
  • Output splits three ways: NFAT via calcineurin, NF-κB via PKCθ–CARMA1–BCL10–MALT1, and AP-1 via Ras–Raf–MEK–ERK.
  • IL-6 in cytokine release syndrome comes mostly from myeloid bystanders, not the CAR-T cell — so effector and toxicity readouts are different panels.
TUMOUR / TARGET CELLCAR-T cell membraneNUCLEUSscFv (anti-CD19)hinge · TMCa²⁺DAGeffector / metabolismsurvival / persistenceCD19CD3ζCD284-1BBLCKZAP-70LATSLP-76PLCγ1CalcineurinNFATPKCθCARMA1Bcl10MALT1IKKNF-κBRasRafMEK1/2ERK1/2AP-1PI3KAKTmTORTRAF2PD-1TIM-3LAG-3SHP-2PerforinGranzyme BFasLIL-2IFN-γIL-6TNF-αTUMOUR-CELL KILLINGPerforin/granzyme + Fas — serial cytotoxicityCAR GENERATIONS1stscFv → CD3ζ (weak, transient)2nd+ CD28 or 4-1BB (standard of care)3rd+ CD28 and 4-1BB (dual costim)4th2nd-gen + cytokine / “armoured”
CAR-T cell signalling from CD19 engagement through the CD3ζ and costimulatory modules to NFAT, NF-κB and AP-1, the cytotoxic and cytokine output, and the inhibitory receptors that limit it.

Explore the interactive version. Every protein in this map is clickable and links straight to the matching Assay Genie In Vivo antibody, ELISA kit or research antibody, with a tooltip explaining its role.

Open the interactive pathway →

Recognition without MHC: the CAR module itself

The targeting half of a second-generation CAR is a single-chain variable fragment against CD19, joined through a hinge and transmembrane segment to a costimulatory tail and then to CD3ζ. Recognition is antibody-mediated, so it is independent of peptide–MHC — which removes the two commonest escape routes, HLA loss and defective antigen processing. CD19 is canonical not because it is tumour-specific but because the on-target toxicity, B-cell aplasia, is survivable.

The synapse a CAR forms is not the classical one. There is no bull's-eye of concentric supramolecular clusters; the contact is disordered, assembles in minutes and disassembles quickly. That geometry is why CAR-T cells serially kill faster than conventional cytotoxic T cells at the same effector-to-target ratio, and why the receptor is comparatively insensitive to low antigen density: below roughly a thousand molecules per target cell, most CD19 CARs stop triggering.

The subtler failure mode is tonic signalling. scFv domains that self-associate cluster in the membrane and let LCK phosphorylate CD3ζ with no antigen present. The product then reaches the patient already partly differentiated and carrying an exhaustion programme. Antigen-independent CD3ζ phosphorylation measured during manufacture is one of the more predictive quality attributes a CAR has — and it is a property of the binder, not of the signalling tail.

The proximal module: LCK, ZAP-70 and the LAT signalosome

Once the receptor clusters, LCK phosphorylates the paired tyrosines of the CD3ζ ITAMs, creating the bidentate site read by the tandem SH2 domains of ZAP-70. From that point a CAR and a TCR are indistinguishable to the cell, with one exception: a CAR carries three ITAMs against the intact CD3 complex's ten. Amplification is correspondingly lower, and deliberately inactivating two of the three has been shown to improve persistence rather than harm it.

Active ZAP-70 phosphorylates LAT, a transmembrane adaptor with no catalytic activity that works purely as a scaffold. It recruits SLP-76, and together they position PLCγ1 to hydrolyse PIP₂ into IP₃ and diacylglycerol. Every branch below derives from those two messengers, so LAT occupancy is a better proxy for functional signal strength than receptor expression is. CAR signalling is also faster and more intense than TCR signalling but decays sooner, which makes kinetics more informative than endpoint measurements.

Costimulation: CD28 versus 4-1BB

Signal one alone produces a T cell that kills once and then dies. CD28 supplies signal two by recruiting PI3K through its YMNM motif and activating AKT and then mTOR: rapid aerobic glycolysis, fast expansion, a strong early effector burst, and typically a shorter-lived product with a steeper cytokine curve in the first week.

4-1BB (CD137) does not use PI3K at all. Its tail binds TRAF2, which nucleates a ubiquitin-dependent complex that activates IKK and drives NF-κB, pushing cells towards mitochondrial biogenesis, fatty-acid oxidation and central memory differentiation. Because the two endodomains feed different transcription factors rather than the same one at different strengths, AKT and mTOR read out a CD28 construct while TRAF2 and nuclear NF-κB p65 read out a 4-1BB one. Comparing both on a single panel is the commonest reason costimulation experiments produce uninterpretable data.

Three transcriptional branches: NFAT, NF-κB and AP-1

IP₃ empties the ER calcium store and triggers store-operated entry; sustained Ca²⁺ activates calcineurin, which dephosphorylates NFAT and exposes its nuclear localisation signal. What NFAT then does depends on its company. Partnered with AP-1 it drives the effector programme; unpartnered, as happens under chronic antigen exposure, it induces the exhaustion-associated transcription factors instead. Nuclear NFAT is therefore not a straightforward activation marker.

Diacylglycerol takes the other route, recruiting PKCθ to the synapse to phosphorylate CARMA1 and nucleate the CBM complex with BCL10 and MALT1. That complex activates IKK, degrades IκB and releases NF-κB onto survival genes and IL-2. This is the branch 4-1BB reinforces from the side, so the CBM components belong in persistence experiments rather than in cytotoxicity ones.

The third branch runs from diacylglycerol through Ras, Raf, MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 to AP-1. Since AP-1 is the partner NFAT needs, the ratio of ERK output to calcium flux sets whether a stimulated cell commits to effector function or drifts towards exhaustion. Constructs over-expressing AP-1 components restore function in chronically stimulated cells — the clearest evidence that this is a stoichiometric problem, not a signal-strength one.

Output: killing, cytokines and the inhibitory brakes

The cytotoxic output is deliberately redundant. Granule exocytosis delivers perforin and granzyme B into the target, while FasL engages Fas for a slower, granule-independent route. Losing either arm alone rarely abolishes clearance in vivo, so a construct that fails to kill has almost always failed upstream, at synapse formation or proximal signalling.

The cytokine output is where the therapy becomes dangerous. CAR-T cells secrete IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-α; those cytokines activate monocytes and macrophages, which produce the bulk of the circulating IL-6 that defines cytokine release syndrome. IFN-γ and TNF-α report CAR-T activity, IL-6 reports the myeloid response to it, and the two dissociate in time.

Chronic exposure then upregulates PD-1, LAG-3 and TIM-3. PD-1 recruits SHP-2, which preferentially dephosphorylates CD28 rather than CD3ζ, so its dominant effect is to remove costimulation rather than signal one. CD28-based CARs are therefore intrinsically more sensitive to PD-1 blockade than 4-1BB-based ones, and combination experiments should be planned accordingly.

Key targets and matching reagents

Target Role in the pathway Reagent
CD19Target antigen; defines specificity and on-target toxicityAnti-mouse CD19 In Vivo
CD28Costimulatory endodomain driving PI3K–AKT–mTORAnti-mouse CD28 In Vivo
4-1BB (CD137)Costimulatory endodomain signalling via TRAF2 to NF-κBAnti-mouse 4-1BB In Vivo
PD-1Recruits SHP-2 to strip costimulation from CD28Anti-mouse PD-1 (RMP1-14) In Vivo
LAG-3Exhaustion marker limiting sustained CAR-T functionAnti-mouse CD223 In Vivo
TIM-3Co-inhibitory receptor on chronically stimulated cellsAnti-mouse CD366 In Vivo
IFN-γPrimary effector cytokine; reports CAR-T activity directlyAnti-mouse IFN-γ (XMG1.2) In Vivo
TNF-αEffector cytokine; contributes to systemic toxicityAnti-mouse TNF In Vivo
IL-2Autocrine growth factor; NFAT and NF-κB outputAnti-mouse IL-2 (JES6-1A12) In Vivo
IL-6Myeloid-derived driver of cytokine release syndromeMouse IL-6 ELISA kit ELISA
Granzyme BSerine protease delivered by granule exocytosisMouse granzyme B ELISA ELISA
PerforinPore-forming protein enabling granzyme entryMouse perforin ELISA kit ELISA

Studying CAR-T signalling in vivo

Most tractable interventions in this pathway are receptor blockade, costimulatory engagement and cytokine neutralisation. In syngeneic and humanised models, experiments fall into three groups.

1. Manipulating the target and the costimulatory input

Anti-CD19 defines the antigen axis and is the reagent of choice for confirming that a phenotype is target-dependent rather than construct-intrinsic. Anti-CD28 and anti-4-1BB let you engage or block the two costimulatory arms separately, which is the cleanest way to test whether a persistence difference really tracks with the endodomain. Agonist antibodies to costimulatory receptors are exquisitely sensitive to endotoxin-driven background activation, so low-endotoxin functional-grade material is a requirement rather than a preference.

2. Releasing or reinforcing the exhaustion brakes

Anti-PD-1 (RMP1-14), anti-LAG-3 (CD223) and anti-TIM-3 (CD366) address the three inhibitory receptors the map shows. Because PD-1 acts largely by recruiting SHP-2 onto CD28, the informative experiment is blockade compared across CD28- and 4-1BB-based constructs, not blockade alone. Pair it with SHP-2 and phospho-CD3ζ readouts to separate checkpoint relief from a general rise in signal strength.

3. Neutralising and quantifying the cytokine output

Anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2), anti-TNF and anti-IL-2 (JES6-1A12) remove the cytokines the CAR-T cell itself makes, while an IL-6 ELISA captures the myeloid amplification loop those blockades are meant to interrupt. Running granzyme B and perforin ELISAs alongside separates a genuine loss of cytotoxic capacity from a purely cytokine-level effect — easy to miss when survival is the only endpoint.

All functional-grade antibodies in this pathway are supplied low-endotoxin and azide-free, formulated for direct administration in mouse models.

Browse the In Vivo range →

Featured products for this pathway

Anti-Mouse CD19 In Vivo Antibody

Low-endotoxin functional-grade antibody for defining the CD19 target axis in vivo.

View product
Anti-Mouse CD28 In Vivo Antibody

Engages or blocks the costimulatory arm that drives PI3K, AKT and mTOR.

View product
Anti-Mouse 4-1BB In Vivo Antibody

Targets the CD137 axis that signals through TRAF2 to NF-κB and favours persistence.

View product
Anti-Mouse PD-1 (RMP1-14)

The reference clone for relieving the SHP-2 brake on CAR-T costimulation.

View product
Mouse IL-6 ELISA Kit

Quantifies the myeloid-derived cytokine that defines cytokine release syndrome severity.

View product
Mouse Granzyme B ELISA Kit

Direct measure of cytotoxic granule output from activated CAR-T cells.

View product

Frequently asked questions

Why does a CAR need a costimulatory domain at all?

CD3ζ alone delivers signal one, which is enough for a single round of killing but not for expansion or survival. First-generation CARs showed this directly: they engaged targets and then disappeared. Adding CD28 or 4-1BB supplies the survival and metabolic programme — AKT and mTOR in one case, TRAF2 and NF-κB in the other — that keeps the cell alive long enough to kill repeatedly.

What is the practical difference between CD28 and 4-1BB constructs?

Kinetics. CD28 signals through PI3K to AKT and mTOR, giving fast glycolytic expansion, a strong early effector burst and often an earlier, sharper cytokine release syndrome. 4-1BB works through TRAF2 and NF-κB, favouring oxidative metabolism and memory differentiation, with slower expansion but longer persistence. Neither is universally better; the choice depends on whether the tumour needs rapid clearance or prolonged surveillance.

Why is IL-6 the target in cytokine release syndrome rather than IFN-γ?

Because CAR-T cells are not the main source of it. They secrete IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2, which activate monocytes and macrophages; those myeloid cells release the bulk of circulating IL-6. Blocking IL-6 signalling interrupts the amplification step without switching off the anti-tumour effector cytokines, which is why it can control the syndrome without abolishing the response.

How can tonic signalling cause exhaustion before any antigen is seen?

Self-associating scFv domains cluster in the membrane and let LCK phosphorylate CD3ζ constitutively. That drives continuous calcium flux and nuclear NFAT without matching AP-1 activity, and unpartnered NFAT induces the exhaustion programme rather than the effector one. The cell arrives pre-differentiated, with PD-1, LAG-3 and TIM-3 already elevated. It is a property of the binder, so it is fixable by protein engineering.

Explore the full interactive map. Click any protein for its role and the matching validated reagent.

Open the interactive pathway →In Vivo antibodies

For research use only. Not for use in diagnostic or therapeutic procedures.

20th Aug 2026 Sean Mac Fhearraigh, PhD

Recent Posts